FAREWELL FOR NOW!!

What you came to see isn't here anymore. Thanks to Georgie and his new Anti-porn-Attorney General with their misguided clamp down on all adult porn. They are using wild, unreasonable regulations covering all models in all graphic representations (regardless of the individual model's age). This is what's suppose to protect the “children” being exploited by us porn providers.

Someone just doesn't understand that the real sleaze bags doing kiddy porn won't follow any rules and usually hide outside the USA.

You want to see naked men over age 25 going at it? Well. whoever provides it to you on the net has got to get (and maintain) information on each performer from whomever originally shot each photo/video. In addition that website owner has to keep records on every place he/she used each photo/video. That's how the DOJ's going to protect “children”.

Nevermind that porn sites can, and should, identify themselves as adult content and give screening services, like NetNanny, the ability to have mommy and daddy control what junior is looking at. Forget that the biggest operation identifying and notifying government officials about true kiddy porn on the net is run by the adult industry. We, and you for being here, are not acceptable in the eyes of those who are now in charge of our government.

Children must be protected. Children must be saved. And, if what's done in the name of 'protecting children' makes porn harder to find and drives it's prices higher so fewer 'sick' people can view it . . . there's nothing wrong with that. What the American public does in private must conform to 'standards' of decency. Don't forget that those standards are being set by a vocal minority who can't even follow the standards of their own messiah. It's now the “American” way of life.

1. We always told viewers about parental controls available:

2. We always identified our sites as 'ADULT' with clear meta tags and voluntary content rating statements.

3. We utilized only licensed content

We never selected content where the model(s) looked younger than 20. And, our content providers were always willing to certify that their models were 'of age' -- and give us data on their record keeper. We haven't, don't and won't support kiddy porn.

But that isn't enough, now! Currently, we just don't want to deal with the hassle of maintaining records on every individual appearing in every picture/video we might use on our sites to give you, the surfer, an idea of the type of content provided by the pay-sites we promote. For now, it's goodbye. Our efforts will be concentrated on link-only sites without graphics – except for smiling faces, semi nude hunks and an occasional tasteful nude (clearly no lascivious exhibitions).

Hugs, and a big WOOF! -- The Gay Albums Gang